Pasang-Surut Komitmen Kebangsaan

  • Yudi Latif Mantan Wakil Rektor Universitas Paramadina, Pengasuh Pesantren Ilmu Kema- nusiaan dan Kenegaraan (PeKiK-Indonesia) & Dewan Ahli Nurcholish Madjid Society
Keywords: nasionalisme; kebangsaan; pluralism; monokulturalisme

Abstract

Our national commitment can be seen through three phases, namely in the early days of independence, in the New Order era, and in the Reform Era. Our national commitment at the beginning of the independen- ce is scratched as negative-defensive nationalism force, when it was faced with a common enemy from outside (colonization). Our national commit- ment in the New Order era is marked by making economy as the comman- der in terms of growth, stability and centralization of power, bringing a variety of inequality. The most striking, there is lack of harmony between the national and statehood character. National multicultural character of Indonesia was denied by the centralized nature of waking state. Imbalance between central and local government with denial of political, social, eco- nomic and cultural rights of local communities. Meanwhile, the national commitment in the Reformation Era is characterized by openness and free- dom of public space that brings euphoria for the expression of marginalized identities. Efforts to bring diversity of expression "plural monoculturalism" into the situation of "multi-culturalism"—with willingness of being differen- ce (pluralism) and willingness of being united (cosmopolitanism)— requires a new solidarity framework, which is based on the premises of political na- tionalism based on rationality, volunteerism and shared prosperity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bagus, D. S. (1997). Pendidikan Politik bagi Generasi Muda dalam Upaya Memantapkan Budaya Politik. [ di akses 14 Des 2012].
Dugis, V. (2012). Peranan Nasionalisme dan Apa Pentingnya, disampaikan pada mata kuliah pengantar ilmu Hubungan Internasional. Departemen Hubungan Internasional. Universitas Airlangga, 22 Oktober 2012.
Kohn, H. (1965). Nationalism: Its Meaning and History, Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1965.
Kartodirdjo, S. (2003). Multidimensi Pembangunan Bangsa: Etos Nasionalisme dan Negara Kesatuan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Sejarah Nasionalisme dan Perspektif Islam”, http://robbani.wordpress.co,/2007/08/01 /4/. [ di akses 14 Des 2012].
Patrick, J. J. & Thomas S. V. (2001). “Components of Education for Democratic Citizenship in the Preparation of Sosial Studies Teachers”, dalam John J. Patrick dan Robert S. Leming (eds.), Principles and Pratices of Democracy in the Education of Social Studie Teacher: Civic Learning in Teacher Education, Volume 1, Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education, pp.39-33.
Tylor, E. B. (1974). Primitive Culture: researches into the development of mythodology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom. New York: Gordon Press. First published n 1871.
Wardaya, B. (2002). ”Nasionalisme Universal: Menjawab Ajakan “PascaNasionalis”nya Romo Mangun”, dalam Jurnal Iman, Ilmu, Budaya. vol. 3. Sept. 2002. Jakarta: Yayasan Bhumiksara.
Yan, W. L. & Murray, P. (2002). Nationalistic Education as the Focus for Civicand Citizenship Education: The Case of Hong Kong in Asia Pacific Education Review 2002, Vol. 3, No. 2, 197-209.
Published
2014-01-01
How to Cite
Yudi Latif. (2014). Pasang-Surut Komitmen Kebangsaan. Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi Dan Perubahan Sosial, 1(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.33258/konfrontasi2.v3i1.68