Internet Memes and the Framing of the Gaza War: Perspectives from Media Narratives

  • Joseph Ifeoluwa Joy Department of Mass Communication, Caleb University, Imota, Lagos, Nigeria
  • Abdullahi Aliyu Maiwada Public Relations Unit, Nigeria Customs Service
  • Mohammed Jibril Nasir Department of Mass Communication, Prime University, Abuja
Keywords: Internet memes, Gaza War, Framing Theory, digital narratives, social media, conflict communication, international coverage, political communication.

Abstract

The increasing prominence of social media has transformed the production, circulation, and consumption of information during armed conflicts, with internet memes emerging as influential tools of digital communication and political expression. This study examines how internet memes framed the Gaza War across international digital spaces and explores the dominant narratives embedded within these visual and textual artifacts. Grounded in Framing Theory, the paper investigates the ways in which memes construct, reinforce, and contest interpretations of the conflict among global online audiences. The study adopts a qualitative comparative research design and relies on secondary data drawn from existing scholarly literature, reports, digital archives, and publicly available meme collections circulated on major social media platforms, including X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, and Reddit during key periods of the conflict. Through thematic and frame analysis, the study identifies recurring frames such as humanitarian crisis, resistance and liberation, victimhood, geopolitical contestation, media bias, and international solidarity. The findings reveal significant variations in meme narratives across different geopolitical and cultural contexts, reflecting divergent ideological positions and media environments. While some memes foreground civilian suffering and humanitarian concerns, others emphasize national security, political resistance, or criticism of international actors and mainstream media institutions. The study further demonstrates that memes function not merely as humorous content but as powerful communicative devices that simplify complex geopolitical issues, facilitate transnational engagement, and shape public perceptions of conflict. The research contributes to the growing body of literature on digital media, conflict communication, and participatory political discourse by highlighting the role of user-generated visual content in the framing of contemporary wars. It concludes that internet memes have become significant alternative mechanisms for international conflict coverage, influencing how audiences interpret events beyond traditional news media frameworks. The study recommends greater scholarly attention to meme culture as an emerging force in global political communication and digital conflict reporting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ademosu, I., Aondover, E. M., Osadolor, B., & Abraham, B. (2025). Divisive politics: analysis of ethnic rhetoric and hate speech in the 2023 Lagos Governorship elections. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1663797.
Alam, S. N., & Farida, A. N. (2025). Memes as Political Discourse: A Semiotic Analysis of Palestine-Israeli Conflict. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(4), 1146-1162.
Amer, M. (2025). Framing Resistance in Hamas’s Military Media: Mobilization Strategies and Discursive Narratives During the Gaza War (2023–2025). Islamic Studies Review, 4(2), 261-287.
Antonakaki, D., & Ioannidis, S. (2025). Cross-Platform Digital Discourse Analysis of the Israel-Hamas Conflict: Sentiment, Topics, and Event Dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02367.
Aondover, E. M. (2024). Media Outlook of Hate Speech in the 2015 and 2019 General Elections in Nigeria. Rotura–Revista de Comunicação, Cultura e Artes, 4(1), 50-63.
Aondover, E. M., & Ademosu, I. (2025). E-learning practices of journalism education in Nigerian higher education institutions: Conceptual context and challenges. In Media and communication systems for sustainability in Nigeria (pp. 451-464). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Aondover, E. M., & Obasi, M. (2025). Identity and the Narratives of Conflict in Nigerian Media. In Media, Conflicts and the National Security Question: Communicating (In) security in Nigeria, West Africa and the Sahel (pp. 315-334). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Aondover, E. M., Ademosu, I., & Acheme, R. (2026). Perception of Hate Speech in the 2023 Presidential Political Campaigns on Voter Behaviour in Nigeria. Frontiers in Political Science, 8, 1750183.
Aondover, E. M., Daushe, A. U., Ogunbola, O., & Aondover, P. O. (2025). Media coverage of internally displaced persons in two selected newspapers in Nigeria. Journal of Migration and Health, 11, 100301.
Aondover, E. M., Ogri, E., Obukoadata, P., & Ogri, O. (2025). Nigerian Media Practitioners, Editorial Freedom and Owners’ Influence: The Continued Triad and Navigation of Conflicting Interests. Editorial Freedom and Owners’ Influence: The Continued Triad and Navigation of Conflicting Interests.
Aondover, E. M., Yusuf, N. T., & Muhammad, M. (2025). Psychological and Physical Safety of Foreign Journalists Covering Boko Haram Conflict in Borno State, Nigeria. In Navigating Trauma in African Journalism, Volume 1: Scholarly Foundations and Secondary Trauma (pp. 209-228). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Arisha Ghazal, D. U. S., & Anwar, A. (2025). Unravelling Global Perceptions of the 2023 Israel-Hamas Conflict: A Discourse-Historical Analysis of Tweets. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(2), 2209-2214.
Azeema, N., Hussain, M., & Ammar, H. M. (2026). Digital Solidarity and Online Protest: A Sociological Study of Global Youth Mobilization during the Israel-Palestine Conflict. Policy Journal of Social Science Review, 4(3), 928-946.
Bollici, G., van Atteveldt, W., & Ilievski, F. (2025). Political Memes as Fragmented Narratives: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Meme Analysis. Available at SSRN 6432282.
Elhosary, M., & Elkashif, M. (2026). Cartooning, framing, and virality: Unraveling the power of political cartoons during the 2023–2024 Gaza War—A comparative approach. International Communication Gazette, 88(3), 253-283.
Fahmy, S. S., Abbas, L., & ElShabassy, A. K. (2025). TikToking the Israel-Gaza War: A Content Analysis of Peace and War Narratives in Audiovisual News. Digital Journalism, 1-28.
Jaber, F. (2026). Framing the Gaza Crisis: A Comparative Analysis of Trudeau’s and Biden’s Social Media Narratives. Studies in Media and Communication, 14(1).
Maradun, L. U., & Aondover, E. M. (2025). Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Towards COVID-19 Prevention Messages on Media in North-West, Nigeria. African Journalism Studies, 1-19.
Mohammed, I., & Aondover, E. M. (2025). News coverage of humanitarian crisis: a study of banditry in Northwest Nigeria. In Handbook on Humanitarian Crises (pp. 209-217). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Nnorom, P., Kayode, O., & Obiyor, B. (2026). [Re] Framing Victimhood: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Digital Narratives on the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict. Israeli–Palestinian Conflict in the Age of Social Media and Artificial Intelligence, 155-172.
Obasi, M. C., & Msughter, A. E. (2023). Assessment of media coverage of environmental hazards in mining communities in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Environmental Challenges, 13, 100758.
Rodley, C. (2016). FCJ-200 When Memes Go to War: Viral Propaganda in the 2014 Gaza-Israel Conflict. The Fibreculture Journal, 27.
Solo-Anaeto, M., Falobi, F., Maiwada, A. A., & Joy, J. I. (2026). Internet Memes as Alternative Frames in Global Media Coverage of the Gaza Conflict. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 9(2), 138-148.
Zidani, S. (2021). Messy on the inside: internet memes as mapping tools of everyday life. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2378-2402.
Published
2026-07-06
How to Cite
Joseph Ifeoluwa Joy, Abdullahi Aliyu Maiwada, & Mohammed Jibril Nasir. (2026). Internet Memes and the Framing of the Gaza War: Perspectives from Media Narratives. Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi Dan Perubahan Sosial, 13(2), 121-134. Retrieved from https://www.konfrontasi.net/index.php/konfrontasi2/article/view/381